Monday, June 29, 2009

Stand by your plan

by Stephen Knight, Political Director

As our readers know, Cargill and DMB recently submitted an application to Redwood City, proposing to build up to 12,000 housing units on retired salt ponds that should be restored to natural wetlands. Before reviewing Cargill's development proposal, the Redwood City Council is working to finalize a new general plan.

In January, the City Council made a public commitment that there were to be no changes made on Cargill's Redwood City salt ponds in the updated plan.

In fact, Redwood City's current general plan map clearly places the entire salt pond property under the category of "Open Space." And the current general plan, in place since 1990, says this about the salt ponds: "Due to the sensitive nature of these open space areas, it should be assumed that they will remain as open space forever."

But a recently released general plan map would remove the words “Open Space” from hundreds of acres of the Cargill salt ponds. See the map here. City staff told the Planning Commission that the so-called "Urban Reserve" on a section of the Cargill property "really wasn't an open space designation." A proposed new "Open Spaces" map graphically illustrates the result – nearly half of the Cargill salt ponds would be taken out of open space.

Redwood City must honor its commitment to "take the Cargill site out of the General Plan Process." The city should renew its vision of saving the salt ponds "as open space forever," just like they are in the current general plan.

We have been told that the City is working to resolve this issue and intends to stand by their word by continuing to describe the "urban reserve" as open space on the land-use map. Exactly what they will do with other existing Cargill-related language from the current general plan – that it should "remain as open space forever" – remains unclear.

Save The Bay is committed to urging the City to renew their vision of saving the salt ponds as open space, which will benefit both people and wildlife.

Learn more at http://www.saveSFbay.org/redwoodcity.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Coots Scoopin' Booty

by Amy Alton, Communications and Policy Associate

If not for recent and shocking reports of pirates capturing large vessels on the high seas, I would not have believed that pirates truly existed. Honestly, until a little over a year ago, I was naïve enough to think that pirates were the stuff of movies and amusement park rides. Imagine my embarrassment at several dinner parties in exposing this truth… But talking pirates got me thinking about another pirate—one of San Francisco Bay’s truest resident pirates: the American Coot.

This bird even looks like a pirate; it has a black body with a bone-white beak and red eyes! You can find coots all around San Francisco Bay, and in especially large numbers at Lake Merritt in Oakland and the duck pond in Palo Alto. But don’t mistake the coot for a duck! Its feet are lobed, rather than webbed, making it part of the rail family. The lobes allow the coot to have both sea and land legs—good for swimming, diving and walking.



Another pirate-like feature: coots are kleptoparasitic, which means that when they don’t feel like hunting for their own food, they’ll steal their booty from other species, such as dabbling ducks, or diving ducks bringing plants up to the surface of the water. They’ve even been known to swipe the food right off a duck or swan’s bill!

Like pirates, coots are often viewed as obnoxious, ugly, and unwelcome pests (hence the term, ‘you old coot!’); but when their population decreases, it’s often a bad sign for other species, as well. Coots are an important indicator species of the overall health of the wetland ecosystem. While pirates may be a danger to those sailing the high seas, I suppose this particular pirate might not be so bad after all.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Cargill paves the way to pave the Bay

by Stephen Knight, Political Director

Cargill Inc and their luxury developer DMB Associates recently released their plan to build a "mini-city" on 1,433 acres of retired salt ponds in Redwood City. Their proposal includes up to 12,000 housing units and 30,000 new residents and would be the largest development on the Bay shoreline since the 1960s.

The project would put new development in the path of rising sea levels and destroy Bay shoreline open space that should be restored. This is not an infill site, nor is it the place for housing and commercial development. You can help us urge Redwood City to continue its current smart growth redevelopment downtown.



On Sunday, the Insight section of the San Francisco Chronicle published an opinion piece written by Save The Bay Executive Director David Lewis pointing out the arrogant and irresponsible nature of Cargill and DMB's plan. These developers, like so many before them, believe they can buy approval for massive sprawl into the Bay, spending millions on slick PR campaigns to pass Bay fill off as "green" development, and making big promises to restore some wetlands on site in exchange for destroying the rest.

Read the article now.

Our region’s quality of life and economy depend on a healthy and vibrant San Francisco Bay, which brings millions of dollars to our state from tourism, industry, recreation and fishing. The Bay and its marshes moderate our local climate, provide vital habitat to 500 species of wildlife and offer natural flood protection for people and communities.

The Bay, including these salt ponds, belongs to all of us, not just Redwood City. The era of filling in San Francisco Bay is over and the entire Bay Area should tell Cargill and DMB that housing doesn’t belong in our Bay.



Help us protect the salt ponds today by visiting our website and adding your name to the many individuals and organizations that have joined Save The Bay, the Sierra Club, and others in signing the petition to save the Redwood City salt ponds.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Weeding in sheets is 'mulch' easier

by Melanie Lopes, Restoration Specialist

“Is there any easier way to do this?”
“Can’t you just get a bulldozer and clear this whole area?”
“Isn’t there some sort of spray that you can use on these plants to get rid of them?”

These are questions that we often hear from volunteers participating in weeding projects through our Community-based Restoration program. The work, albeit satisfying, is labor intensive and time-consuming, and after about an hour’s worth of pulling, digging, and lopping, people start to wonder if there’s a better way.

The manual removal that we do with volunteers is an effective strategy for thoroughly removing populations of weeds in areas where native plants are present. Bulldozers, power tools, and herbicides, however time-saving they may be, are not as selective, and simply are not options given the nature of our sites and the nature of a community-based program.

However, we have found a technique for weed management that is efficient, effective, and appropriate for our programs – it's called sheet mulching. And it's a technique that can be used to eliminate large areas of weeds while simultaneously enriching the soil. It involves smothering the weeded area by laying down a layer of compost, then cardboard, followed by a thick layer of mulch (wood chips, straw, leaf litter, etc). As time passes, the cardboard and the existing weeds underneath begin to decompose, adding nutrients to the soil. Furthermore, sunlight is blocked from the soil, preventing future weed germination. This creates a blank slate for planting native seedlings in enriched soil, without competition from aggressive weeds.

Here are a few photos to show you what we mean.





So far, we have tried this technique at only one site, along a trail at the Palo Alto Baylands. We chose an area that was covered solely by non-native plants, making it easy to completely cover the area without fear of destroying any natives. With the generous contributions from the City of Palo Alto, we had enough compost, cardboard, and mulch delivered to the site to get the project underway. In the fall of 2006, a group of volunteers from PG&E came out to help install the first section of sheet mulch – an effort that was met with great success. The area was left to rest for one year, in order to allow the cardboard and weeds to decompose. The following winter our first plantings went in and the results were phenomenal. Three years later, the area is thriving with native plants, with hardly any weeds in sight!



We've expanded the sheet mulch area down the trailside, and we hope to continue using this technique at other sites as well. Finding appropriate areas for this approach and acquiring the necessary resources (cardboard, compost, mulch) are the main obstacles we face, but based on the remarkable results we’ve seen down at the Palo Alto Baylands, we know that getting another sheet mulch project underway is well worth the effort.

Sign up for one of our Community-based Restoration programs at www.saveSFbay.org/restore.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Save The Bay makes the national news!

by Amy Alton, Communications Associate

We got some national attention last night when ABC's World News with Charles Gibson featured our "The Bay vs. the Bag" video during a segment on the negative environmental impact of plastic and paper single-use bags and the steps cities across the nation are taking to reduce pervasive bag pollution and litter.

Check it out!

And read all about it. Click here for more news stories about cities nationwide that are helping residents to kick the bag habit.